Technocratic Decadence Thesis
> Join 10K+ engineers getting posts like this in their inbox.
Abstract
Western tech is decaying because leadership has been fully decoupled from competence: non-technical elites wield AI, credentials, and spreadsheet theater to replace the builders they can't understand, simulating progress while the institutions rot from within.
If you want the structured version of this argument, the interactive thesis map lays out all five stages and the videos attached to each branch.
1. Takeover
Push out the artisans who built the great companies. Replace them with resource managers who are abstracted from the work. Once the pattern is normalized, create training programs that only teach vague skills such as management and "business administration." Remove the requirement that managers understand the work being done by their employees. Replicate at scale.
Leadership is now the only skill that matters. Technical ability is for the underlings. AI is marketed as a replacement for the workers, not the leaders. The MBA exists to provide a defensible credential when "what qualifies this person?" questions arise. It doesn't teach anything you can't learn faster on the job, but it does cost two years and six figures, which conveniently screens out anyone without wealth. The circle stays small.
In the social media era, the MBA alone isn't enough. Now the primary qualifier is image. Spray tan, Vuori costume, "genius" positioning, rags-to-riches narrative, celebrity peer endorsements. If you can convince the median-IQ populace you're a leader, you're in.
Imagine: you enlist in the army and deploy to a hostile country. Your sergeant barks orders at you. He has never held a gun, but he does hold an MBA from Stanford GSB. His Stanford buddy got him the job. This is the strange situation we find ourselves in.
2. Hyperquantify
The MBAs don't understand the technology that the company produces, but they need to look important.
A quandary, for sure.
They retreat to the only skill they learned in the MBA program: Excel spreadsheets. They "crunch the numbers," "run some Monte Carlo simulations," and "see if it fits the models." If it's not in a spreadsheet, it no longer exists. Everything must be quantified to a number and that number must go up at any cost.
This is far from the wisest course of action, but it's what they know, and it's all their investors know (they're friends from the MBA program), so everything must be represented as a number.
3. Replace
The tech sales bros show up with slicked-back hair, cheap Zara suits, Folex watches, and enough Paco Rabanne cologne to be convicted of war crimes in some jurisdictions. They pitch the leaders in a beige conference room on full AI replacement of their workforce. Nobody in the room has ever written a for loop, but there are some MBA types and a few looksmaxxers with big followings in the tech space, so the vibe is good and they pay $2M a year for the tool that's going to replace 3,000 of their software engineers.
They lay off 3,000 engineers. It's not personal (or technical), but the numbers in the Excel spreadsheet do need to make sense to the board. Right now the bottom-line SUM box is red, so they keep doing layoffs in waves until the box is black again.
4. Save Face
Shit, there's a bunch of outages and complaints about the company's software. Every engineering leader with technical skill has been purged and replaced by someone with "better leadership credentials" from Stanford, but it's still happening.
The board already saw that the bottom-line box was in the black. If it were to go red again at the next quarterly earnings, that would be bad.
So there's not enough money to hire American engineers (who are way overpriced anyway; hopefully AI can just replace all of them soon), but the MBAs put their heads together and remember the American Express case study from school. They cut their spend by importing employees on H-1B visas and forcing them to work 80 hours a week because they're not lazy sacks of shit like their American counterparts, with their exorbitant luxuries like worker protections and unemployment benefits.
Even that proves too expensive, though.
But good news: they score an office building in Bangalore, IN (not Indiana) and announce to the board their plans for innovation and expansion.
5. Decline
All of the people who built the system have been laid off or burned out and left because they were suddenly expected to do 100x their usual amount of work "becuz AI." Meetings are now a scheduling nightmare with a 12.5-hour time difference. Communication goes down the toilet. The social media app the company built was hugely popular with its American userbase, but DAUs have fallen off a cliff because most of the people working on it don't understand American culture.
Mostly this doesn't matter because the leaders have all cashed out their pay packages and begun their second lives as venture capitalists. They don't know much about how to assess a company, but that's fine. They'll just look for founders with MBAs.
If you want to browse the full framework instead of reading it linearly, the thesis page maps the whole cycle branch by branch.
> Enjoyed this? There's more where that came from.
I write about engineering leadership, tech careers, and the stuff nobody else will say. Free AI Spending Tracker PDF with signup.
> Keep reading
The Optics-Driven Workplace and the Death of Competence
“I’m a Timestamp Man” Every company has at least one dude and sometimes a whole gaggle of them who manages by the clock. He doesn’t read your code, doesn’t
I’m Rooting for AI to Blow Up in Everyone’s Face
A blunt take on AI hype, false equivalence around expertise, and why human messiness is worth defending.
nobody cares how much you use AI when coding and we should stop pretending
and learn to mind our own business.